News | Events | About Us | Contact Us |
|||
|
|||
HOME | JOURNAL | PAPERS | RESEARCH | FOCUS AREAS | SUPPLIERS | AWARDS |
|||
|
Seven IT Strategies to Help Survive the Downturn New Fluid IT Architecture -- How It Works and Why It Matters to Your Organization 2008 Market Predictions: FAO, Global Sourcing, HRO, ITO, and PO Markets Comparison of Outsourced and Captive Solutions for Capturing Value from Offshoring Trend Report: Challenges in Adopting Service-Oriented Architecture Global Sourcing Market Update: Indian Captive Market: Trends and Implications Improving Merger Success through Outsourcing Financial Accounting Outsourcing (FAO) Annual Report - January 2007 |
The Meat and Potatoes of Multi-Vendors By Bill Martorelli
"What we've seen is the tendency of customers to split awards, perhaps in the context of prime contract/subcontractor relationships or as totally different and discrete awards based on different needs," he said. "I think we'll see the latter occur more than the Pinnacle Alliance type structure." While structures such as Pinnacle can offer many benefits, Martorelli said they also can be problematic in terms of level of management needed. "A lot of people have been preferring to make more direct relationships with their outsourcing vendor, as opposed to building up this multi-vendor structure," he said. Find a Management BalanceMartorelli also noted the danger of creating a bureaucratic structure that can drag out decision making. That issue is one that a customer contemplating any multi-vendor relationship structure should consider. "They'll need to be careful about finding the right ground between leaving too much control in the hands of the outsourcing vendors versus over-specifying and over-bureaucratizing the outsourcing governance and capability," he said. Six Steps to SuccessThat bit of advice was one of several Martorelli offered customers considering a move into multi-vendor relationships. Six other key points included:
Serving the Mid-Range MarketThe mid-range opportunities are an important element in multi-vendor outsourcing, according to Martorelli. "As important as the very big deals are, that's not going to be the be-all, end-all of this business as a whole," he said. "The kinds of relationships in which customers retain control not only accommodate a wider range of customers, but also allow them to be more flexible in terms of their own business requirements. Those requirements are going to be rapidly changing for all companies, including those in the middle tier." Business process outsourcing (BPO) is one of the drivers in the multi-vendor arena. "Clearly companies have different processes," said Martorelli. "They're not going to outsource them all to one vendor, because no one vendor is the master of all business processes. That's going to be a major challenge as to how a company can farm out separate business processes to separate companies and yet retain some sort of overall coherence of cross-functional views." Pushing the EnvelopeHow companies respond to those challenges is one to be one factor in success, according to Martorelli. He noted that the outsourcing marketplace has always changed and evolved and cited the movement in BPO and ERP as proof that the lines between what outsourcing has been in the past and what it's becoming will continue to blur. "Customers should keep their thoughts on other emerging forms of outsourcing," said Martorelli, "and not let their minds be shackled by historic patterns, so they don't overlook some possibilities that could be advantageous to them from a business perspective. "They should challenge the conventional wisdom of outsourcing," he added, "because that's what all the truly successful customers have done." Publish Date: June 1998
For more information... Copyright © 1998 - Everest Partners, L.P.
|
|
||
|
|
||||